Atlantis Arisen
July 06, 2022, 11:01:28 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Corals May Have Defense Against Global Warming
  Home Help Search Arcade Links Staff List Login Register  

Madison360: Mantra of wealthy Republicans — we want the rest

Pages: [1]   Go Down
Author Topic: Madison360: Mantra of wealthy Republicans — we want the rest  (Read 173 times)
Lisa Wolfe
Posts: 255

View Profile
« on: August 15, 2011, 04:51:28 pm »

Madison360: Mantra of wealthy Republicans — we want the rest

Madison360: Mantra of wealthy Republicans — we want the rest
PAUL FANLUND | The Capital Times | | (56) Comments | Posted: Monday, August 15, 2011 6:45 am
Blog: Madison360
Paul Fanlund is the editor of The Capital Times, the fifth editor in its history. A long-time Madisonian, he was a State Journal reporter and editor before taking a business job with Madison Newspapers for six years. He joined the Cap Times in 2006. With Madison360, he offers insights into the Cap Times and CT-fueled sites such as and sports, and shares information, observations and links to help readers better engage in our always interesting city.
More from this section
Madison360: Is a speed trap actually a trap at all?
Madison360: Last-minute reminder of stakes in Tuesday's recalls
Madison360: Why is Paul Soglin so abrasive, and does it matter?
Madison360: Salon makes Wisconsin's voter ID law Exhibit A talking about the "new Jim Crow"
Madison360: Recalls aside, give GOP puppet masters an A+
Before he died in a recent car accident, I'd never heard of Charles Wyly.
He was killed near Aspen, Colo., when his Porsche was struck by a sports utility vehicle. Wyly, 77, and his younger brother became billionaires by building and trading companies from their base in Dallas.
The brothers reportedly gave $10 million to Republican candidates over the years, including $30,000 to the Swift Boat campaign that smeared the Vietnam War record of Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry in 2004. Wyly's obituary in the New York Times said he later regretted not studying the ads more closely.
Last year, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed suit against the brothers for allegedly using offshore havens to hide more than $500 million in profits from insider stock trading, but that's beside the point.
No, my point is that Wyly's activism exemplifies how some of the wealthiest among us are obsessed with buying influence to further shake off tax and regulatory constraints and to expand the already yawning gap between themselves and everyone else.
In Wisconsin and elsewhere, it's working for them. The top 1 percent of U.S. earners receives nearly a quarter of the nation's income, which is more than double their share of the income pie from only 25 years ago.
I recently wrote about how wealthy, masterful Republican strategists are using our formerly progressive state as a proving ground for how to use limitless spending to purchase extreme outcomes. At the same time, they have worked feverishly to slant future elections by destroying unions, distorting political boundaries and suppressing voter turnouts.
The question I keep asking myself, probably naively, is why?
They already have the best houses, the best schools, the best cars and the best medical care. They have the best overall lifestyles and do not need government help. They have already achieved the greatest wealth gap in U.S. history and it is growing. Their tax burden is historically low.
What more, exactly, do they want?
Talk all you want about Gov. Scott Walker and fellow Republicans "leading" in this radical direction. But Walker and more moderate GOP legislators are themselves being led. They are career politicians who keep sashaying to the right for political self-preservation via campaign dollars.
Even ex-Gov. Tommy Thompson, the state's most successful Republican politician of his generation, is dutifully retreating from his laudable record of centrism and even-handedness in submissive pursuit of the big-money crowd to get the 2012 Republican nod for the U.S. Senate. So now he proclaims, he was never for health-care reform or high-speed rail. Yeah, right.
No, the politicians are pawns.
"The brakes are off and that's our system of government now," observes Andrew Kersten, a University of Wisconsin-Green Bay labor historian. Kersten's new book is titled, "The Battle for Wisconsin: Scott Walker and the Attack on the Progressive Tradition." Kersten has been asking why wealthy donors in and out of Wisconsin seem so relentless. "Why are they even doing this? I kept thinking that the people who have the money wouldn't go for everything because they need a middle class to sell to," he says in an interview.
But with global markets, maybe that is wrong, he says. "I don't think they even want the American consumer anymore," Kersten says. "How much money do they want? The answer is they want it all. You almost have to question their patriotism at some point."
A recent in-depth article in Vanity Fair magazine was headlined, "Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%." That top 1 percent controls 40 percent of the nation's wealth and their share is growing rapidly. Their income has increased 18 percent over the past decade while the middle class has seen income fall.
If these are "job creators," the euphemism used by Walker and others to describe the wealthy, where is the evidence? It is pretty clear job creation has much to do with education, infrastructure and technology, headings under which government plays a role. The unabated wealth gap and historically low taxes on the rich do not seem to be working to create jobs for many of us.
The New York Times reported last week that 63 percent of respondents in a Times/CBS News Poll support higher taxes on households earning more than $250,000 a year to help reduce the federal deficit.
But the wealthy, with a stranglehold on the GOP, rejected a deficit deal by President Obama that had spending cuts far greater than tax increases aimed at the wealthy. The resulting turmoil has contributed to the financial market havoc affecting ordinary families who are trying to build wealth to send their children to college or to retire.
In Wisconsin as in Washington, the media have consistently gotten it wrong by suggesting the two parties are equally at fault and need to meet in the middle, says Professor Erik Wright, a UW-Madison sociologist and an expert in the relationship of politics and social class. The political center is where Obama and state Democrats already reside, he says. "The Republican Party has been captured by extreme right-wing ideologues."
In recent days, the post-recall Walker strategy is as transparent as it is ludicrous, but some editorial writers still buy it. Walker is calling for the two parties to work together. Honest to God, he is. This from the guy who only months ago told a congressional committee that bipartisanship is a bad thing. One reason is obvious. Those pulling the GOP strings have forced through all they wanted, so now can afford to pretend they care about the views of roughly half of Wisconsin citizens.
But back to motivations.
In a recent article, a noted psychologist says studies show that rich people really are different. Dacher Keltner, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, told an MSNBC interviewer that multiple studies produced a consistent outcome. "Lower class people just show more empathy, more prosocial behavior, more compassion, no matter how you look at it," he says.
Beyond that, rich people "think that economic success and political outcomes, and personal outcomes, have to do with individual behavior, a good work ethic," says Keltner.
"Because the rich gloss over the ways family connections, money and education helped," interviewer Brian Alexander writes, paraphrasing Keltner, "they come to denigrate the role of government and vigorously oppose taxes to fund it." (I keep thinking of the words "born on third base but think they hit a triple" and the image of George W. Bush comes to mind.)
Last week, Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald, a Juneau Republican, proclaimed of the two Republican senators who lost recall elections: "They took a bullet for the taxpayers."
They took a bullet, all right, but it wasn't for taxpayers. It was for the millionaires and billionaires whose water they carried.
Copyright 2011 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Posted in Madison_360, Blogs on Monday, August 15, 2011 6:45 am Updated: 7:46 am. Paul Fanlund, Republican, Income Distribution, New York Times, Republican Party, Wisconsin, Scott Walker, Charles Wyly, The New York Times, Andrew Kersten, Dacher Keltner, George W. Bush, John Kerry, Securities And Exchange Commission, Governor, Tommy Thompson, Vanity Fair, Erik Wright, Msnbc, Brian Alexander, Scott Fitzgerald

Read more:
« Last Edit: August 15, 2011, 04:52:38 pm by Lisa Wolfe » Report Spam   Logged

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Lisa Wolfe
Posts: 255

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 15, 2011, 04:52:06 pm »

Crime And Courts
Sauk County DA named special prosecutor in alleged state Supreme

Court fracas
Sauk County DA named special prosecutor in alleged state Supreme Court fracas
ED TRELEVEN | | 608-252-6134 | (2) Comments | Posted: Monday, August 15, 2011 10:57 am
Related Stories
Related: Records of alleged Supreme Court fight won’t be released until special prosecutor’s decision
Related: Dane County DA requests special prosecutor for Supreme Court fracas
More from this section
Records of alleged Supreme Court fight won’t be released until special prosecutor’s decision
Illinois man injured after dive into shallow part of Wisconsin River
Two men get 16 years in prison apiece in rap battle shooting
Iraq War vet gets 1˝ years in prison for killing dog
La Crosse Co. deputy facing felony is fired
Sauk County District Attorney Patricia Barrett has been appointed the special prosecutor who will decide whether to pursue any criminal charges involving an alleged June 13 fracas involving state Supreme Court Justices David Prosser and Ann Walsh Bradley.
William Foust, chief judge of the state court system's Fifth District, made the announcement Monday morning.
Barrett, a Republican who has been the DA in Sauk County since 1994, was appointed to handle the case after Dane County District Attorney Ismael Ozanne withdrew from the case to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest. Ozanne had prosecuted an alleged open meetings violation by a legislative conference committee that was the subject of Supreme Court deliberations at the time of the alleged fracas.
Bradley said that Prosser put his hands around her neck after she told him to leave her office. Prosser denies the allegation.
Ozanne is a Democrat. Prosser is a former Republican state legislator. Foust is a former Dane County DA who held the post as a Democrat. Bradley has never held a partisan political office but is considered a member of the court's liberal wing.
The Dane County Sheriff's Office, which investigated the alleged incident, has refused to release its reports until the special prosecutor decides whether charges will be filed.
Copyright 2011 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Posted in Crime_and_courts, Govt-and-politics, Breaking_news on Monday, August 15, 2011 10:57 am

Read more:
« Last Edit: August 15, 2011, 04:52:57 pm by Lisa Wolfe » Report Spam   Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Jump to:  

Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum

Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy