Twin Towers Bulletins

“The problem is not one of ‘apathy’ as much as ‘atrophy.’

“People think they can successfully oppose the building of the mosque, but they do not think there is anything they can do about the development of the World Trade Center – because they have been subject to years of disinformation. It’s only human nature that when we think we can’t do something, we don’t even try – and when we don’t try we get weaker and weaker. That doesn’t mean we don’t care.

“The blogosphere was in its toddler stage in 2001-2002, so all the media had to do was suppress the truth that the public was strongly in support of new Twin Towers — and not bother to report that Silverstein’s 7/24/01 contract required him to rebuild not just some towers, but THE Towers, if they were ever ‘damaged or destroyed.’

“All the media had to do was call the Port Authority the site’s ‘owner’ instead of explaining that it is merely the public’s agent spending the public’s money – and then give credance to the red herring that most 9/11 families opposed rebuilding the Twin Towers.

“And all they had to do was not notice when Pataki wrote the real World Trade Center out of the program for his ‘Innovative Design Study’ and then pretend that the result was legitimate when he threw his own ‘competition’ by anointing the Libeskind plan instead of the actual twin-towered winner.

“If that basic information had been included in just one of the numerous 9/11 ‘documentaries’ it would have discredited the whole process and the Twin Towers would be shining now. There had to be collusion — that continues to this day. There is no reputable way that professional journalists could have all independently gotten it so wrong…

“The people have been subject to disinformation and misinformation, from the beginning. The media have served as willing, and in many cases unwitting, propagandists. The people, including the bloggers, are being played.